Fleksibilitas Kerja dan Turnover Intention Karyawan Perbankan: Peran Kepuasan Kerja dan Keadilan Organisasi

Lidia Olga; Feti Arman

Authors

Lidia Olga Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Nusantara Lampung
Feti Arman Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Nusantara Lampung

Keywords:

fleksibilitas kerja, turnover intention, kepuasan kerja, keadilan organisasi, perbankan

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengevaluasi hubungan fleksibilitas kerja dengan turnover intention serta peran kepuasan kerja dan tiga dimensi keadilan organisasi pada data survei perbankan. Analisis sekunder menggunakan 204 respons dan 29 item berkode 1–5. Skor komposit dianalisis melalui regresi bertahap dengan galat baku HC3, 10.000 bootstrap, dan pemeriksaan sensitivitas. Koefisien fleksibilitas berubah dari −0,814 pada model bivariat menjadi −0,184 setelah pengendalian keadilan dan kepuasan (interval kepercayaan 95% [−0,364; −0,004]). Model lengkap menjelaskan 50,9% variasi skor niat keluar dalam sampel. Kepuasan kerja dan keadilan distributif berhubungan negatif dengan niat keluar, sedangkan koefisien unik keadilan prosedural dan interaksional tidak presisi. Asosiasi tidak langsung fleksibilitas melalui kepuasan sebesar −0,113 dengan interval bootstrap [−0,238; −0,011], tetapi interval melintasi nol setelah 12 respons berpengaruh dikeluarkan. HTMT keadilan distributif–kepuasan mencapai 0,942, menandakan persoalan keterpisahan konstruk. Interaksi fleksibilitas dan kepuasan tidak menunjukkan bukti yang presisi. Temuan mendukung evaluasi bersama kebijakan fleksibilitas dan keadilan, dengan pembatasan klaim mekanisme karena desain potong lintang, keterbatasan dokumentasi instrumen, dan sensitivitas hasil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. W. Hom, T. W. Lee, J. D. Shaw dan J. P. Hausknecht, “One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 102, no. 3, hlm. 530–545, 2017. doi: 10.1037/apl0000103.

A. L. Rubenstein, M. B. Eberly, T. W. Lee dan T. R. Mitchell, “Surveying the forest: A meta‐analysis, moderator investigation, and future‐oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 71, no. 1, hlm. 23–65, 2018. doi: 10.1111/peps.12226.

N. Bloom, R. Han dan J. Liang, “Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance,” Nature, vol. 630, no. 8018, hlm. 920–925, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2.

E. E. Kossek, M. B. Perrigino dan B. A. Lautsch, “Work-Life Flexibility Policies From a Boundary Control and Implementation Perspective: A Review and Research Framework,” Journal of Management, vol. 49, no. 6, hlm. 2062–2108, 2023. doi: 10.1177/01492063221140354.

N. V. Shifrin dan J. S. Michel, “Flexible work arrangements and employee health: A meta-analytic review,” Work & Stress, vol. 36, no. 1, hlm. 60–85, 2022. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2021.1936287.

M. K. Tsen, M. Gu, C. M. Tan dan S. K. Goh, “Does flexible work arrangements decrease or increase turnover intention? A comparison between the social exchange theory and border theory,” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 42, no. 11-12, hlm. 962–983, 2022. doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-08-2021-0196.

D. Gašić dan N. Berber, “The Mediating Role of Employee Engagement in the Relationship between Flexible Work Arrangements and Turnover Intentions among Highly Educated Employees in the Republic of Serbia,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, artikel 131, 2023. doi: 10.3390/bs13020131.

G. Damara dan M. Rahardjo, “Job satisfaction sebagai mediasi terhadap pengaruh flexible work arrangements dan organizational justice dengan turnover intention karyawan,” Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 8, no. 1, hlm. 1–15, 2024. doi: 10.24912/jmbk.v8i1.28392.

R. Indradewa dan A. A. Prasetio, “The influence of flexible working arrangements and work-life balance on job satisfaction: A double-layered moderated mediation model,” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, vol. 26, no. 2, hlm. 449–476, 2023. doi: 10.24914/jeb.v26i2.9551.

H. W. Lee dan D. Y. Rhee, “Effects of Organizational Justice on Employee Satisfaction: Integrating the Exchange and the Value-Based Perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, artikel 5993, 2023. doi: 10.3390/su15075993.

K. K. Moon, “Fairness at the Organizational Level: Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice Climate on Collective Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance,” Public Personnel Management, vol. 46, no. 2, hlm. 118–143, 2017. doi: 10.1177/0091026017702610.

H. J. Lee, T. M. Probst, E. L. Bettac, M. R. Jenkins dan A. Bazzoli, “The Use of Flexible Work Arrangements: Examining Experiences of Perceived Backlash Through the Lens of Diversity,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 49, no. 5, hlm. 1159–1198, 2024. doi: 10.1177/10596011221150025.

M. H. Lin, Y. H. Yen, T. F. Chuang, P. S. Yang dan M. D. Chuang, “The impact of job stress on job satisfaction and turnover intentions among bank employees during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, artikel 1482968, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482968.

D. E. Guest, “Human resource management and employee well‐being: towards a new analytic framework,” Human Resource Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, hlm. 22–38, 2017. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12139.

A. Kuswandini, R. Deranti, A. Nirmala, dan E. R. Simanjuntak, “The Role of Organizational Justice in Predicting Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Indonesian Banks,” Mendeley Data, versi 1, 2025. doi: 10.17632/ff4bxnxp8j.1.

A. Kuswandini, R. Deranti, A. Nirmala dan E. R. Simanjuntak, “The Role of Organizational Justice in Predicting Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Indonesian Banks,” Global Business and Finance Review, vol. 31, no. 1, hlm. 185–200, 2026. doi: 10.17549/gbfr.2026.31.1.185.

P. G. Curran, “Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 66, hlm. 4–19, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006.

D. McNeish, “Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here,” Psychological Methods, vol. 23, no. 3, hlm. 412–433, 2018. doi: 10.1037/met0000144.

A. F. Hayes dan J. J. Coutts, “Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…,” Communication Methods and Measures, vol. 14, no. 1, hlm. 1–24, 2020. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629.

J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle dan M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, no. 1, hlm. 115–135, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

J. K. Flake dan E. I. Fried, “Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them,” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 3, no. 4, hlm. 456–465, 2020. doi: 10.1177/2515245920952393.

A. F. Hayes dan N. J. Rockwood, “Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 98, hlm. 39–57, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001.

J. M. Rohrer, “Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data,” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 27–42, 2018. doi: 10.1177/2515245917745629.

R. L. Wasserstein, A. L. Schirm dan N. A. Lazar, “Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”,” The American Statistician, vol. 73, no. sup1, hlm. 1–19, 2019. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913.