Operationalizing Green Constitutionalism in Nusantara: A Constitutional Compliance Framework for Environmental Governance
Keywords:
environmental constitutionalism, IKN, environmental governance, intergenerational justice, regulatory complianceAbstract
This article evaluates whether the post-2023 legal architecture for Indonesia's Nusantara Capital City (IKN) has converted green constitutional commitments into operational and reviewable environmental duties. It develops a Constitutional Green Compliance Framework (CGCF) from the constitutional right to a good and healthy environment, environmentally sustainable economic governance, and the earlier finding that IKN regulation remained vulnerable to a gap between constitutional aspiration and implementation. Using normative legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and regulatory-design approaches to Law No. 3 of 2022 as amended by Law No. 21 of 2023, the IKN master-plan and spatial-planning instruments, Perka OIKN No. 8 of 2024, and Perka OIKN No. 17 of 2025. The audit examines six dimensions: constitutional traceability, ecological thresholds, decision controls, procedural rights, monitoring and disclosure, and remedial accountability. The analysis finds substantial regulatory consolidation, particularly through environmental planning, environmental approvals, recognition of local wisdom, information systems, supervision, and enforcement instruments. Nevertheless, compliance remains operationally partial because headline targets are not yet consistently linked to mandatory corrective triggers, publicly verifiable ecological budgets, independent review, and citizen-accessible remedies. Published evidence concerning biodiversity-sensitive urban growth, long-term water constraints, land-use conflict, and illegal mining reinforces the need for enforceable carrying-capacity limits. The article proposes a six-link CGCF that connects constitutional mandates to ecological budgets, decision gates, participatory assurance, public audit, and restoration-based remedies. Its contribution is to transform green constitutionalism from a justificatory principle into a repeatable compliance test for IKN governance.
References
Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2024). Is it possible for sustainability? The case from the new capital city of Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1362337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1362337
Ammar, M. A., Budihardjo, M. A., Chegenizadeh, A., & Nikraz, H. (2026). Building a sustainable future for Indonesia's new capital, the Nusantara capital city (IKN). Sustainable Futures, 11, 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101718
Anirwan, A., Aljurida, A. A., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Developing a new capital city (IKN) in Indonesia: A thematic analysis. Policy & Governance Review, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v8i1.863
Arfiansyah, D., Hawken, S., Zlatanova, S., & Han, H. (2024). Cellular automata modelling to simulate patterns of urban growth for Nusantara: Indonesia’s new capital. Spatial Information Research, 32, 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-024-00599-5
Bertram, D. (2023). “For you will (still) be here tomorrow”: The many lives of intergenerational equity. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(1), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000395
Dwiono, S., Haryadi, S., & Ananda, A. R. (2026). The urgency of a green constitution policy in the development of the Indonesian capital city as a green economy-based city. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 9(1), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v9i1.32232
Gilbert, J. (2023). Creating synergies between international law and rights of nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(3), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102523000195
Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Developing a forest city in a new capital city: A thematic analysis of the Indonesian government’s plans. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.1-13
Indrayana, D. V. (2024). The new capital Nusantara net zero strategy of Indonesia: Sustainable and environmental friendly city through level of service standardization. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(12), 4881–4889. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191235
Kotzé, L. J. (2023). The right to a healthy environment and law’s hidden subjects. AJIL Unbound, 117, 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2023.27
Kotzé, L. J., & Villavicencio Calzadilla, P. (2017). Somewhere between rhetoric and reality: Environmental constitutionalism and the rights of nature in Ecuador. Transnational Environmental Law, 6(3), 401–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000061
Kusworo, D. L., & Arsil, F. (2024). Green constitutional paradigm for sustainable environmental development in the capital of Archipelago: A comparative research with France and Ecuadorian Constitution. Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v11i02.769
Lawrence, P. (2022). Justifying representation of future generations and nature: Contradictory or mutually supporting values? Transnational Environmental Law, 11(3), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000176
Perwira, I., Harijanti, S. D., Susanto, M., & Adhihernawan, M. Y. (2024). Capital city relocation in Indonesia: Compromise failure and potential dysfunction. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2345930. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2345930
Said, N. I., Hernaningsih, T., Sudinda, T. W., Yudo, S., Widayat, W., Plamonia, N., Santoso, A. D., Setiyono, Wahyono, H. D., Rifai, A., Setiadi, I., & Sulaeman, O. (2024). Forecasting and sustainability of raw water supply for Indonesia’s new capital. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(1), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190118
Steinkamp, T. (2023). Intergenerational justice as a lever to impact climate policies: Lessons from the complainants’ perspective on Germany’s 2021 climate constitutional ruling. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14(4), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.38
Sulyok, K. (2024). Transforming the rule of law in environmental and climate litigation: Prohibiting the arbitrary treatment of future generations. Transnational Environmental Law, 13(3), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102524000116
Syaban, A. S. N., & Appiah-Opoku, S. (2024). Unveiling the complexities of land use transition in Indonesia’s new capital city IKN Nusantara: A multidimensional conflict analysis. Land, 13(5), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050606
Syafi’i, I., Suryani, D., Satriani, S., Aulia, D., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Adaba, P. Y. (2025). Displaced by progress: The new capital development and the powers of exclusion in Balikpapan Bay, Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 269, 107801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107801
Teo, H. C., Lechner, A. M., Sagala, S., & Campos-Arceiz, A. (2020). Environmental impacts of planned capitals and lessons for Indonesia’s new capital. Land, 9(11), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110438
van de Vuurst, P., & Escobar, L. E. (2020). Perspective: Climate change and the relocation of Indonesia’s capital to Borneo. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00005
Yusuf, A. A., Roos, E. L., Horridge, J. M., & Hartono, D. (2023). Indonesian capital city relocation and regional economy’s transition toward a less carbon-intensive economy: An inter-regional CGE analysis. Japan and the World Economy, 68, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2023.101212
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sugeng Dwiono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

