Principal Leadership in Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum: An Interdisciplinary Case Study in Indonesian Primary Education
Keywords:
principal leadership, merdeka curriculum, curriculum implementation, primary education, educational managementAbstract
This study examines the role of school principal leadership in implementing the Merdeka Curriculum at a public primary school in Indonesia using an interdisciplinary qualitative approach. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through structured interviews, observations, and document analysis at SDN 1 Sidorejo, a school that has implemented the Merdeka Curriculum at the independent sharing stage. The findings indicate that effective curriculum implementation is strongly influenced by the principal’s ability to integrate managerial, supervisory, and instructional leadership roles. As a manager, the principal optimized limited resources and prioritized teacher development to support curriculum demands. Through academic supervision, the principal monitored instructional practices and provided feedback that contributed to gradual improvements in teaching quality. In addition, instructional leadership was reflected in efforts to foster teacher collaboration, encourage pedagogical innovation, and build a supportive learning culture. Despite positive outcomes, challenges were identified, including varying levels of teacher readiness, resistance to change, and limited access to technological resources. The study concludes that successful implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum requires sustained and adaptive school leadership capable of managing organizational change while supporting teachers’ professional growth. These findings contribute to the international literature on school leadership and curriculum reform, particularly in the context of primary education in resource-constrained settings.
References
Bush, T. (2019). Instructional leadership and leadership for learning: Global and contextual perspectives. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745880
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin Press.
Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15533-3
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Leading educational change and improvement at scale. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 933–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217728211
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Nguyen, T. D., Hunter, S. B., & Springer, M. G. (2020). A conceptual framework for understanding teacher turnover and retention. Educational Researcher, 49(7), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20935820
OECD. (2021). School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to student performance? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4b3c1b32-en
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2021). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(9), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1676314
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2017). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Syakir Media Press.
Silalahi, U. (2009). Metode penelitian sosial. Refika Aditama.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Yusuf, M. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan. Kencana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wira Zaky Fauzul Kabir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















